Joseph Stalin, Film Star: the Cult of Personality on Soviet Screens

25th September 2024

118 attended our first lecture.

Dr Claire Knight gave a fascinating lecture on the how the personality cult around Stalin used cinema to promote Stalin as leader.  Despite a few technical hiccups our massive audience of members, students and guests were entertained by film clips and extracts from letters to understand the impact these films made on Soviet citizens.  Many Western film critics dismissed these films as meaningless corny propaganda. However, a study of them proved a real insight into how Soviet citizens attitudes to their leader changed over the decades. Claire began with the expensive technicolour film The Fall of Berlin, where Stalin features only in a cameo role.

She examined his role as the loyal comrade in Lenin in October in constant contact with Lenin and The Vow (1946) where he is marked out as Lenin ‘mark 2’ fulfilling Lenin’s role after his death but providing hundreds of 1000s of tractors where Lenin had only promised tens of 1,000s.

Claire went on to show how the ‘Great Patriotic War 1941-45’, changed the image of Stalin.  He is was no longer just Lenin’s disciple but ‘The Lone leader.’  There were endless runs of posters portraying Stalin as the great general and like Tsars before him he was depicted as the all knowing leader as in the film The Battle of Stalingrad.  Claire explained how Socialist Realism was used to portray the image of Stalin often using the same actors and even the same lines to tell similar stories decades apart.  

A new image of Stalin as the ‘Wise Leader’ was also given to cinema audiences.  Among the most eccentric of these, The Peasant (1935) featured a cartoon image of Stalin alongside a peasant mother and her tractor driving husband and her new baby.  The director Ermler believed in Freuds psychological theories and suggested the film would not have got through later Soviet censors.  Among Claire insights into the images of Stalin in posters and films was his depiction not as a father to a specific child but his role as Father of Nations and groups of children.

In the final part of her lecture Claire examined the archive of letters which showed the reaction of citizens to the film The Fall of Berlin. The writers were unexpectedly hostile.  They disliked the central character Alesha who they regarded as uneducated and not representative of modern Soviet citizens.  The critiques asked for rewrites but they also made the point that they were not small children of the Great Father (Stalin) but more like adult children of an elderly parent.  In her final thoughts Claire pointed out that these Soviet citizens, including the reviewers in the official paper Pravda, saw their role in the Great Patriotic War as central to its victory.  The crude propaganda of the 1920s and 1930s was no longer acceptable and they used the language of Social Realism to pull apart the images of The Fall to Berlin.  Again living under ‘Everyday Stalinism’ proves to be more complex than the old stereotypes of an absolute dictator. 

VIA DOLOROSA Sunday 1st September 2024

A huge thank you to Dr Evan Jones for leading 28 Bristol HA pilgrims along the Via Dolorosa from Newgate (Castle Park) to Bewell’s Cross (Cotham Hill). Despite the rain Evan was able to paint a picture of how the condemned prisoners were taken on their final journey to the gallows at the top of St Michael’s Hill. The journey passed the High Cross at the centre of the city, the Guildhall on Broad Street, St Peter’s Gate and across the Frome before the steep ascent to northern outskirts of the city.

You can follow our route using this link.

or read the Wikipedia pages for Newgate and Bewell’s Cross.

BRISTOL HARBOUR WALK

Sunday 12th May 2024

Twenty seven souls joined Rob on a guided walk from Redcliffe Parade to the very end of the Cumberland Basin system. We paused at Bathurst Basin, Princes Wharf, the Albion dockyard, the Underfall Yard and the lock system beyond the Plimsoll Bridge. Chronologically we journeyed from Saxon Brigstowe to the closure of the City Docks in the 1970s.

Henry VIII…… Another BLOckbuster lecture from Ronald Hutton

Wednesday 1st May 2024

Professor Hutton’s lecture was never a defense of Henry making clear he showed every characteristic of a megalomanic right from the beginning of his reign.  His war against France, his assault on the Pope’s authority, the immediate execution of his father’s chief ministers and his ambition to be the Holy Roman Emperor all showed Henry as a King with a “chip on his shoulder” from the start of his rule.  Henry attempted to model himself on King Arthur and Henry V and was man of manic energy, enormous appetite, and impressive physical presence. The lecture posed four apparently straight forward questions about Henry and his kingship.

  • Was he businesslike?
  • Was he cultivated or intelligent?
  • Was he a nice guy?
  • Was he a good general or statesman?

 Professor Hutton presented detailed evidence for and against each question with wit and conciseness overturning many of the traditional myths about Henry’s role in English History. He was clearly a selfish monarch who discarded those he had no further use for, destroyed much of the heritage of the English Catholic church and was responsible for the death of hundreds including 330 political executions in eight years.

 Professor Hutton made three conclusions about the strengths that enabled Henry to survive for 38 years as monarch.  These were his choice of talented ministers, his ability to handle his nobility in the century after the Wars of the Roses, and his use of Parliament.  Finally, despite his faults Henry has gripped the imagination of the public, historians, and A level examiners in a way no other king of England has done.  This brilliant lecture was followed by lively and well informed questions from our audience of 167 to which Professor Hutton responded with wit and expertise until unfortunately we ran out of time.  One local teacher told us her students we still “buzzing” the next day.  

Review of Professor Brendan Smith’s lecture  

Migration in an age of plague and warfare: England in the late Middle Ages

17th April 2024

Last week our Bristol HA audience heard a highly relevant reappraisal of ideas on immigration and population movement in the context of England in the late Middle Ages. Professor Smith’s lecture took in modern views of the Windrush generation and the focus on immigration in an election year in the UK. He shared his observations on protests that Republic of Ireland was “full up” despite its population being 3 million less than before the famine of the 1840s and claims that a billion immigrants were on the move across the Globe.
He urged the need for historical context that went back before the 19th century nation state to overturn the myth that “no-one was allowed to travel beyond the next town”. Great medievalists like Marc Bloch had created a view of the medieval society of isolated, sedentary peasants when much more global experience and trade existed. Peasants in fact got up and left the land, re-locating in large numbers and in an age before the modern ‘state’ existed the authorities lacked the power to stop them. The key drivers for this movement in the late middle ages were plague and warfare.

He sought to distinguish between three types of population movement then and now. Immigration, Emigration, and internal migration. He cited Mark Ormrod’s website which showed the experience of those who moved to England between 1350-1550 http://www.englandsimmigrants.com/

The resident alien populations of medieval cities and towns were of similar proportion to London in 1901. There were periodic moments of anti-foreign feeling. This included the massacre of the Flemish community in London in1381. Regarding emigration the experiences in Gascony, the Channel Islands and Ireland paralleled those of the 19th century British Empire. Particularly striking were the so-called “idle men” who in the Hundred Years War brought pillage and mayhem to France and often became mercenaries in other European conflicts. Most importantly the internal migration because of labour shortages after the Black Death caused rural peasants to get up and move to the towns which needed newcomers especially those with skills. In the South West industries attracted populations because of the woollen industry. This internal migration rather than peasant rebellions led to the break up of the feudal system. Brendan concluded with a quote from Thomas Hardy who lamented the decline of the traditional old customs of the English countryside in the 19th century as people moved away. Brendan suggested that populations had never been static and the countryside had seen movement and change throughout the late Middle Ages.
There followed some excellent questions from our audience. Many of us who think of ourselves as modern or even contemporary historians were given real food for thought by Professor Smith.

CHANGES TO OUR MAY AND JUNE SCHEDULE

Please note that we have rescheduled our end of season events.

Wednesday 1st May 7.30pm Lecture  Professor Ronald Hutton The Kingship of Henry VIII
Sunday 12th May 10.30am – 12.30pm WalkRob Pritchard Bristol harbour walk. Contact Rob if you would like to go
Wednesday 19th June 7.30pm LectureMike Robinson Fanny and George: two teenagers at Waterloo

223 at Bristol HA Russian history conference

Wednesday 27th March 2024

223 students and teachers came from as far away as Plymouth, Chard and Gloucester to the Bristol Historical Association Rusian history conference.

Dr Alistair Dickens talked to the conference about the different interpretations of the Russian Revolution. Professor Geoffrey Swain talked about the Russian Civil War. Dr Maria Mattingly’s talk asked whether the Soviet Union was doomed from the start. Alistair Dickens finished the day with a talk to teachers about new approaches to teaching Russian History.

Resources have been put on our website.